From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sparrow v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jun 27, 2017
Docket No. 2:15-cr-129-NT (D. Me. Jun. 27, 2017)

Opinion

Docket No. 2:15-cr-129-NT Docket No. 2:16-cv-449-NT

06-27-2017

WAYMAN SPARROW Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

May 31, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. (ECF No. 69). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and it is ORDERED that the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition (ECF No. 1) be and hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge Dated this 27th day of June, 2017.


Summaries of

Sparrow v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jun 27, 2017
Docket No. 2:15-cr-129-NT (D. Me. Jun. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Sparrow v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WAYMAN SPARROW Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jun 27, 2017

Citations

Docket No. 2:15-cr-129-NT (D. Me. Jun. 27, 2017)