From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0070 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0070 DAD P.

February 12, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On January 15, 2010, the court ordered petitioner to either file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee ($5.00). In accordance with the court's order, petitioner has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, upon review of petitioner's IFP application, the court finds that petitioner is able to afford the $5.00 filing fee for this action. Petitioner's inmate trust account statement indicates that he has a current balance of $1,172.56. In addition, the certificate portion of petitioner's IFP application indicates that, during the past six months, petitioner's average monthly balance was $206.14 and the average monthly deposits to his account was $230.49. Accordingly, the court will deny petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis and direct him to pay the filing fee for this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's February 5, 2010 application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 5) is denied; and

2. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, the appropriate filing fee ($5.00). Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation for dismissal of this action.


Summaries of

Smith v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0070 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Smith v. People

Case Details

Full title:MATHEW ROBERT SMITH, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 12, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0070 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2010)