From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Ives

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 18, 2008
No. CIV S-08-2467 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2467 GGH P.

November 18, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within thirty days from the date of this order. If an answer is filed, respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application.

2. Petitioner's reply, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondent's answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of service of the motion to dismiss;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the United States Attorney.


Summaries of

Smith v. Ives

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 18, 2008
No. CIV S-08-2467 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. Ives

Case Details

Full title:SEAN SMITH, Petitioner, v. RICHARD B. IVES, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 18, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2467 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2008)