From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sledge v. Warner Music Grp. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Apr 18, 2013
CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS

04-18-2013

DEBRA SLEDGE, JOAN SLEDGE, KATHY SLEDGE LIGHTFOOT and KIM SLEDGE ALLEN, jointly d/b/a "SISTER SLEDGE"; RONEE BLAKLEY; and GARY WRIGHT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP., Defendant.

Tamerlin J. Godley MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP Attorneys for Defendant Warner Music Group Corp. Daniel L. Warshaw PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP Interim Lead Counsel Representative for Plaintiffs [sup*]


MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
GLENN POMERANTZ (SBN 112503)
TAMERLIN GODLEY (SBN 194507)
MELINDA E. LEMOINE (SBN 235670)
ANJAN CHOUDHURY (SBN 236039)
Glenn.Pomerantz@mto.com
Tamerlin.Godley@mto.com
Melinda.LeMoine@mto.com
Anjan.Choudhury@mto.com
355 South Grand Avenue
Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: (213) 683-9100
Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
Attorneys for Defendant
WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP.

JOINT STATEMENT/STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER


Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg

Plaintiffs in the above captioned consolidated action and Defendant Warner Music Group Corp. ("WMG") together submit this joint statement/stipulation.

On August 31, 2012, this Court granted a stay of the proceedings to allow the parties to participate in settlement discussions and set a further status conference on March 14, 2013. Over the course of those six months, the parties diligently participated in settlement negotiations. They exchanged information and analysis to facilitate the negotiations. They participated in two full day mediation sessions with the Honorable Daniel Weinstein (Ret.), and they held additional phone conferences with and without the mediator.

On February 28, 2013, pursuant to the Court's stay order, the parties made a joint filing with the Court reporting on the status of the negotiations and requesting that the case remained stayed because of the ongoing talks. The Court extended the stay, setting a Case Management Conference for May 2, 2013 and asking the parties to make a joint filing regarding the status of the negotiations on April 18, 2013. The Court's order, like the first, provided that if, at the time of the filing of the joint statement the parties agreed that further settlement discussions would be fruitful, they could seek additional time for further negotiations. Stay Order at 3.

The parties have continued to diligently pursue settlement negotiations over the last two months. In particular, the parties participated in an in-person settlement meeting on March 6, 2013. Thereafter, the parties continued their discussions by phone and email, which discussions are ongoing. While the parties have not reached a settlement at this juncture, the negotiations are constructive and progress has been made. All parties are committed to continuing the settlement discussions at this time.

For these reasons, the parties jointly file this statement/stipulation to inform the Court that they believe further settlement discussions would be fruitful and to seek additional time for continued negotiations. Specifically, the parties hereby agree and stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following:

1. A further Case Management Conference to be set in 60 days, subject to the schedule of the Court; and shall be scheduled for 6/27/13 at 10:00 a.m.
2. Fourteen days before the Case Management Conference—or before that date if
Plaintiffs and/or WMG believe that settlement cannot be reached—the parties shall file a joint statement/stipulation with the Court alerting the Court to the fact that settlement could not be reached and resetting a schedule for WMG's response to the Amended Complaint (which deadline for WMG's response shall be no sooner than 30 days from the date of the joint statement) and subsequent dates and deadlines. In the alternative, if the parties agree that further settlement discussions would be fruitful, the parties can instead file a joint statement/stipulation seeking additional time for further settlement negotiations.

Respectfully Submitted,

By: ____________

Tamerlin J. Godley

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Warner Music Group Corp.

Respectfully Submitted,

By: ____________

Daniel L. Warshaw

PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP

Interim Lead Counsel Representative for Plaintiffs

A complete list of the attorneys for Plaintiffs is attached to the Amended Complaint.

Filer's Attestation

I, Tamerlin J. Godley, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this JOINT STATEMENT/STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER. I hereby attest that the counsel listed above concur in this filing.

____________

Tamerlm J. Godley

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________

Honorable Richard Seeborg

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Sledge v. Warner Music Grp. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Apr 18, 2013
CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Sledge v. Warner Music Grp. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA SLEDGE, JOAN SLEDGE, KATHY SLEDGE LIGHTFOOT and KIM SLEDGE ALLEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)