From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpson v. Mahan

Supreme Court of Virginia
Nov 29, 1971
185 S.E.2d 47 (Va. 1971)

Opinion

42594 Record No. 7761.

November 29, 1971

Present, All the Justices.

Mandamus — Congressional Candidates — Election at Large.

Petition prays for peremptory writ requiring election at large of Congressional candidates. Since federal statute provides otherwise writ cannot legally be issued.

Petition for Peremptory Writ of Mandamus.

Writ denied.

L. David Lindauer, for petitioner.

Anthony F. Troy, Assistant Attorney General (Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General; Vann H. Lefcoe, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for respondents.


Petitioner O'Wighton Delk Simpson alleges that the Fourth Congressional District of Virginia, as established by the Redistricting Act of 1971, Va. Acts of Assembly 1971, ch. 118, Va. Code Sec. 24.1-4.1 (Supp. 1971), does not consist of compact and contiguous territory as required by the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Virginia. Consequently, he alleges, the Redistricting Act is unconstitutional and Representatives cannot be legally elected from the ten districts fixed by the Act. Simpson prays that we issue a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the State Board of Elections to certify Congressional candidates only for election at large from the State of Virginia.

An Act of Congress enacted in 1967 requires that each state establish a number of districts equal to the number of Congressional Representatives to which such state is entitled, and that "Representatives shall be elected only from districts so established . . .". 2 U.S.C. § 2c. So we cannot legally issue the writ Simpson prays for. Accordingly, the writ is denied. See Davis v. Dusch, 205 Va. 676, 139 S.E.2d 25 (1964).

Writ denied.


Summaries of

Simpson v. Mahan

Supreme Court of Virginia
Nov 29, 1971
185 S.E.2d 47 (Va. 1971)
Case details for

Simpson v. Mahan

Case Details

Full title:O'WIGHTON DELK SIMPSON, ETC. v. JOAN S. MAHAN, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF THE…

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Nov 29, 1971

Citations

185 S.E.2d 47 (Va. 1971)
185 S.E.2d 47

Citing Cases

Assembly v. Deukmejian

There appear to be three pertinent cases: (1) Whitcomb v. Chavis (1971) 403 U.S. 124, 158, footnote 39 [29…

Branch v. Smith

In its decision on December 29, 1967, that court observed that the enactment of § 2c had "relieved [it] of…