Summary
concluding that issue raised in brief but not designated in notice of appeal was not properly before the court
Summary of this case from Queen v. City of BridgetonOpinion
Argued October 11, 1994 —
Decided October 27, 1994.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
James J. Higgins argued the cause for appellant ( Boyar, Higgins Suozzo, attorneys). Paul M. Selitto argued the cause for respondent ( Pitman, Senesky, Nicola Selitto, attorneys).
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 269 N.J. Super. 463, 635 A.2d 1004 (1994).
For Affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — None.