reasoning that "copying the claimed invention, rather than one in the public domain, is indicative of non-obviousness"
Summary of this case from Volvo Penta of the Am's. v. Brunswick Corp.No. 85-1846.
June 23, 1986.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 780 F. 2d 475.
reasoning that "copying the claimed invention, rather than one in the public domain, is indicative of non-obviousness"
Summary of this case from Volvo Penta of the Am's. v. Brunswick Corp.Windsurfing I
Summary of this case from BIC LEISURE PRODUCTS v. WINDSURFING INTERNnoting that "§ 552(b) gives the bankruptcy court considerable latitude in applying pre-petition security interests to post-petition proceeds" and that "Congress undertook in [§ 552(b)] to find an appropriate balance between the rights of secured creditors and the rehabilitative purposes of the Bankruptcy Code"
Summary of this case from In re River Village AssociatesFull title:SHELTON ET AL. v. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 23, 1986
Smith confessed to the murders. For a more detailed exposition of the facts and procedural history of this…
Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisWhile a person denied a promotion or transfer will certainly be disappointed and may remain in a lower-paying…