Opinion
No. 76-509.
November 29, 1976.
ORDERS
C.A. 2d Cir. Motion of SCM Corp. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae and certiorari denied. Reported below: 542 F. 2d 111.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Singer Co. v. Perma Research & Development Co.
U.S.
Nov 29, 1976
429 U.S. 987 (1976)
Summaries of
Singer Co. v. Perma Research & Development Co.
U.S.
Nov 29, 1976
429 U.S. 987 (1976)
applying New York law
Summary of this case from Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.In Doyle v. Ohio, 429 U.S. 987 (1976), the United States Supreme Court held that the use for impeachment purposes of a defendant's silence at the time of arrest and after receiving Miranda warnings violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Summary of this case from Coleman v. StateCase details for
Singer Co. v. Perma Research & Development Co.
Case Details
Full title:SINGER Co. v. PERMA RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT Co
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 29, 1976
Citations
429 U.S. 987 (1976)
Citing Cases
Permanence Corp. v. Kennametal, Inc.
While the phrase "best efforts" is often used to describe the extent of the implied undertaking, this has…
In re IsringhausenIt is well settled that the word "may" in the statutory phrase, "[a] continuation statement may be filed . .…