From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seymore v. Shawver Sons, Inc.

U.S.
Oct 20, 1997
522 U.S. 935 (1997)

Summary

stating that a union "cannot acquiesce in a company's prohibited employment discrimination and expect to evade Title VII liability . . ."

Summary of this case from Rainey v. Town of Warren

Opinion

No. 97-5642.

October 20, 1997.


ORDER

C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 111 F. 3d 794.


Summaries of

Seymore v. Shawver Sons, Inc.

U.S.
Oct 20, 1997
522 U.S. 935 (1997)

stating that a union "cannot acquiesce in a company's prohibited employment discrimination and expect to evade Title VII liability . . ."

Summary of this case from Rainey v. Town of Warren

stating that where the alleged retaliation "occurs prior to the filing of a charge and the employee fails to allege the retaliatory act or a retaliation claim in the subsequent charge, the retaliatory act ordinarily will not reasonably relate to the charge"

Summary of this case from Fry v. Holmes Freight Lines, Inc.
Case details for

Seymore v. Shawver Sons, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SEYMORE v. SHAWVER SONS, INC., ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 20, 1997

Citations

522 U.S. 935 (1997)
118 S. Ct. 342

Citing Cases

State v. Addison

The trial court has wide discretion in determining the competence of an expert witness and its ruling on the…

Simms v. State of Oklahoma

Thus, a plaintiff normally may not bring a Title VII action based upon claims that were not part of a…