From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Labora

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 17, 1996
670 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

holding that trial court acted within its discretion in ordering defendant corporation to pay costs of notice to class because the ruling provided the most economically viable means of assuring efficient and cost-effective notification

Summary of this case from Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Cox

Opinion

No. 95-2606.

February 28, 1996. Rehearing Denied April 17, 1996.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Murray Goldman, Judge.

Arnstein Lehr, and Wesley A. Lauer, West Palm Beach; Arstein Lehr, and Stanley M. Lipnick, and Arthur L. Klein, and Thomas P. Yardley, Chicago, for appellant.

Maland Ross, and Lauri Waldman Ross, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellant, Sears, Roebuck and Co., appeals an order granting appellee Alexander J. Labora's motion for class action certification in a breach of contract action. We affirm with modification.

The four prerequisites for class certification are numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequate representation. Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.220(a). See Broin v. Philip Morris Cos., 641 So.2d 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), rev. denied, 654 So.2d 919 (Fla. 1995). We have carefully reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's application of these criteria to grant class certification. See Love v. General Dev. Corp., 555 So.2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Accordingly, we affirm the order granting class certification except to the extent that it identifies the class as including "all persons and business entities." In accordance with this Court's recent opinion in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Engle, 672 So.2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), we direct that the order be modified to limit the certified class to "Florida residents and business entities."

Additionally, we find no error in the trial court's ruling that the appellant initially pay the cost of notice. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.220(d)(2). At this stage of the proceedings, this ruling provides the most economically viable means of assuring efficient and cost-effective notification. See Johnson v. Plantation Gen. Hosp. Ltd. Partnership, 641 So.2d 58 (Fla. 1994); Frankel v. City of Miami Beach, 340 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1976).

Affirmed with directions.


Summaries of

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Labora

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 17, 1996
670 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

holding that trial court acted within its discretion in ordering defendant corporation to pay costs of notice to class because the ruling provided the most economically viable means of assuring efficient and cost-effective notification

Summary of this case from Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Cox

affirming a class certification order in a breach of contract action sans fraud allegations

Summary of this case from Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Almeida
Case details for

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Labora

Case Details

Full title:SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., APPELLANT, v. ALEXANDER J. LABORA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 17, 1996

Citations

670 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Cox

" The Court, however, has broad discretion to order the party opposing class certification to advance the…

Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Almeida

Particularly where as here, there are no allegations in the amended complaint that the bank is presently…