stating in dictum that armed robbery and accessory after the fact to armed robbery are mutually exclusive offenses and are not joinable for trial
Summary of this case from State v. JewellNo. 78-1054.
February 21, 1979, OCTOBER TERM, 1978.
C.A. 7th Cir. Motion of Certain Sealy Licensees for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 585 F. 2d 821.
stating in dictum that armed robbery and accessory after the fact to armed robbery are mutually exclusive offenses and are not joinable for trial
Summary of this case from State v. JewellFull title:SEALY, INC., ET AL. v. OHIO-SEALY MATTRESS MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 21, 1979
Defendants maintain that the issue of equitable relief with respect to the exclusive manufacturing…
Yentsch v. Texaco, Inc.Appellant urges us to adopt a sixth test for determining an illegal tying, namely whether the seller of the…