From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sealy, Inc. v. Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co.

U.S.
Feb 21, 1979
440 U.S. 930 (1979)

Summary

stating in dictum that armed robbery and accessory after the fact to armed robbery are mutually exclusive offenses and are not joinable for trial

Summary of this case from State v. Jewell

Opinion

No. 78-1054.

February 21, 1979, OCTOBER TERM, 1978.


C.A. 7th Cir. Motion of Certain Sealy Licensees for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 585 F. 2d 821.


Summaries of

Sealy, Inc. v. Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co.

U.S.
Feb 21, 1979
440 U.S. 930 (1979)

stating in dictum that armed robbery and accessory after the fact to armed robbery are mutually exclusive offenses and are not joinable for trial

Summary of this case from State v. Jewell
Case details for

Sealy, Inc. v. Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co.

Case Details

Full title:SEALY, INC., ET AL. v. OHIO-SEALY MATTRESS MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 21, 1979

Citations

440 U.S. 930 (1979)

Citing Cases

Ohio-Sealy Mattress Mfg. Co. v. Kaplan

Defendants maintain that the issue of equitable relief with respect to the exclusive manufacturing…

Yentsch v. Texaco, Inc.

Appellant urges us to adopt a sixth test for determining an illegal tying, namely whether the seller of the…