From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schumacher v. Capital Advance Sols.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jun 25, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0436 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 25, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0436

06-25-2020

PAUL R. F. SCHUMACHER, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ADVANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC, CHARLES BETTA, and DAN LOGAN, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

Having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation dated June 8, 2020 (Docket Entry No. 63), to which no objections were filed, the court is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED by this court. The court shall enter a Final Judgment by separate order.

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 25th day of June, 2020.

/s/_________

SIM LAKE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Schumacher v. Capital Advance Sols.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jun 25, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0436 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 25, 2020)
Case details for

Schumacher v. Capital Advance Sols.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL R. F. SCHUMACHER, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ADVANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-0436 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 25, 2020)

Citing Cases

Noviello v. Adam Wines Consulting, LLC

Further, the ability for TCPA plaintiffs to recover for multiple violations arising out of a single call is…

Thompson v. Dealer Renewal Servs.

The Court may grant damages for violations of both 227(b) and (c) based on the same conduct. See Schumacher…