From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 1, 2013
No. C-13-0900 EMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)

Opinion

No. C-13-0900 EMC

04-01-2013

ROGER SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has filed a motion to dismiss in the above-referenced action which is currently set for hearing on May 9, 2013. See Docket No. 15 (notice). Because Wells Fargo filed its motion on March 7, 2013, Plaintiffs' opposition brief was due on March 21, 2013. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a) (providing that "[t]he opposition must be filed and served more more than 14 days after the motion was filed"). Plaintiffs, however, have failed to file any opposition.

Accordingly, the Court hereby issues this order to show cause. Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause as to why their case should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs' response shall be filed no later than a week from the date of this order. Plaintiffs are forewarned that, if they fail to file a timely response to this order to show cause, then the Court shall dismiss all claims against Wells Fargo, leaving only WSR23 World Savings Remic Trust as the sole defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 1, 2013
No. C-13-0900 EMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:ROGER SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 1, 2013

Citations

No. C-13-0900 EMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)