Rutledge v. Strange

Full title: JONATHAN LOUIS RUTLEDGE, Petitioner, v. LUTHER STRANGE, Respondent.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 28, 2014

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv785-TMH (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 28, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv785-TMH (WO)

08-28-2014

JONATHAN LOUIS RUTLEDGE, Petitioner, v. LUTHER STRANGE, Respondent.

Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that:

(1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 22) are overruled.



(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 13) is adopted.



(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 28th day of August, 2014.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE