From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Warden, Marion Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 22, 2016
Case No. 3:15-cv-331 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-331

08-22-2016

James A. Russell, Plaintiff, v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution, Defendant.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MERZ (DOC. 24), OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, (DOC. 22, 26), DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, (DOC. 1), AND TERMINATING THE INSTANT CASE.

On March 25, 2016, Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz filed a Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 20), suggesting that the Court deny Petitioner James A. Russell's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 1). Petitioner James A. Russell filed Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendations, (Doc. 22), prompting the Magistrate Judge to file a Supplemental Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 24). Petitioner then filed Objections to the Magistrate's Supplemental Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 26).

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case, taking into consideration both of Petitioner's objections. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's objections, (Docs. 22, 26), to the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendations, (Doc. 24), are not well taken and they are hereby OVERRULED. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS IN FULL the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 24). Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Doc. 1), is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion as to Grounds Two through Seven, Petitioner is hereby denied a certificate of appealability and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore Petitioner will not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

However, in light of Foster v. Chatman, 587 U.S. ___, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3486 (2016), Russell's Batson claim would be debatable among reasonable jurists. Petitioner is therefore GRANTED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ON GROUND ONE.

DONE and ORDERED this Monday, August 22, 2016.

s/Thomas M. Rose

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Russell v. Warden, Marion Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 22, 2016
Case No. 3:15-cv-331 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Russell v. Warden, Marion Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:James A. Russell, Plaintiff, v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Aug 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-331 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 22, 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Russell

The district court dismissed the petition with prejudice, but granted a certificate of appealability for…

State v. Russell

The district court dismissed the petition with prejudice, though it granted a certificate of appealability…