From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rush v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-00915-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Mar. 21, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-00915-CWR-FKB

03-21-2014

ALICE RUSH PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE DEFENDANT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes on pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball and the written objection to the proposed findings and recommendation. Based upon the evidence therein contained, this court, having given full consideration to the aforesaid objection, and the Commissioner's response in opposition to the objection, finds the objection is not well taken. Substantial evidence supports the findings of the Administrative Law Judge, and the Commissioner's decision must be affirmed. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted as the order of this court and the court hereby dismisses plaintiff's claims against the defendant with prejudice.

Carlton W. Reeves

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rush v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-00915-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Mar. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Rush v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALICE RUSH PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-00915-CWR-FKB (S.D. Miss. Mar. 21, 2014)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Colvin

The regulations clearly outline who qualifies as an acceptable medical source, and the ALJ was not obligated…