From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 24, 2023
2:23-cv-0238 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0238 KJN P

02-24-2023

MAURICE DI AUNDRA ROGERS, Petitioner, v. JEFF LYNCH, Respondent.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Therefore, petitioner is provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 24, 2023
2:23-cv-0238 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Rogers v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE DI AUNDRA ROGERS, Petitioner, v. JEFF LYNCH, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0238 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2023)