holding that no constitutional violation is presented by the fact that a defendant makes the difficult choice of whether to testify on his own behalf
Summary of this case from Williams v. StateNo 96-1767.
June 2, 1997.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 103 F. 3d 1140.
holding that no constitutional violation is presented by the fact that a defendant makes the difficult choice of whether to testify on his own behalf
Summary of this case from Williams v. Statefinding that use of term "substantial" to modify "planning and premeditation" does not render aggravating factor unconstitutionally vague, rather it conveys a more precise definition
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Taylorconsidering the identical aggravator under 21 U.S.C. § 848(n)
Summary of this case from U.S. v. GreenFull title:ROE v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 2, 1997
This court acknowledges that the clear majority of courts reject " Morgan questions" with any degree of case…
Pitchford v. Stateomitted); see also United States v. McVeigh, 153 F.3d 1166, 1208 (10th Cir. 1998) ("[W]e have held that…