From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 1, 2018
Case No. 2:18-CV-114 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 1, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-CV-114

06-01-2018

Julio Rodriguez, Petitioner, v. David Gray, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura OPINION AND ORDER

On February 12, 2018, Petitioner, a state prisoner, sought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. On March 19, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition be transferred to the Sixth Circuit as successive because it constitutes Petitioner's second attempt to challenge the same 1995 state court conviction under § 2254. ECF No. 4. A review of this Court's docket in Rodriguez v. DeWitt, Case No. 2:99-cv-879 (S.D. Ohio, Sept. 10, 1999) also reveals that Petitioner could have brought the claims that he currently asserts—involving allegations about the state court judge's actions in 1995—in his previous § 2254 action. In re Bowen, 436 F.3d 699, 704 (6th Cir. 2006) (citing McClesky v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 489 (1991)). Moreover, although Petitioner was advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The R&R, ECF No. 4, is therefore, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Petitioner's motion to amend is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 1, 2018
Case No. 2:18-CV-114 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:Julio Rodriguez, Petitioner, v. David Gray, Warden, Belmont Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 1, 2018

Citations

Case No. 2:18-CV-114 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 1, 2018)