From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. East Lawn Mem. Park

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 20, 2006
No. 02-05-289-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 20, 2006)

Opinion

No. 02-05-289-CV

Delivered: April 20, 2006.

Appeal from the 89th District Court of Wichita County.

Panel F: CAYCE, C.J.; HOLMAN and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Andrew Roberts and Mary Smith appeal from a no-evidence summary judgment for East Lawn Memorial Park Cemetery. In a single issue, appellants complain that the summary judgment is improper because the trial court first denied the motion for summary judgment and than granted it without further notice to them. Appellants did not raise this complaint in the trial court; therefore, it is waived on appeal. Accordingly, we overrule appellant's issue and affirm the trial court's judgment.

TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a); see H.S.M. Acquisitions, Inc. v. West, 917 S.W.2d 872, 877 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1996, writ denied) (holding that appellant failed to preserve error by objecting in trial court to lack of notice before trial court reconsidered and reversed its prior ruling denying motion for summary judgment). We also note that a trial court has discretion to grant summary judgment without notice after previously denying same, as long as the court retains jurisdiction over the case. Id. at 876-77; see also Hunte v. Hinkley, 731 S.W.2d 570, 571 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.).


Summaries of

Roberts v. East Lawn Mem. Park

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 20, 2006
No. 02-05-289-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Roberts v. East Lawn Mem. Park

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW ROBERTS AND MARY SMITH, Appellants, v. EAST LAWN MEMORIAL PARK…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Apr 20, 2006

Citations

No. 02-05-289-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 20, 2006)