From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Burlington Industries

U.S.
Jun 23, 1986
477 U.S. 901 (1986)

Summary

recognizing that ERISA, which occupies the field of employee benefit plans, see Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 451 U.S. 504, preempts state claims whether raised under state statutes or at common law

Summary of this case from Oglesby v. Delaware Hudson Railway Co.

Opinion

Nos. 85-441, 85-460.

June 23, 1986.


ORDER

Affirmed on appeals from C.A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 765 F. 2d 320.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Burlington Industries

U.S.
Jun 23, 1986
477 U.S. 901 (1986)

recognizing that ERISA, which occupies the field of employee benefit plans, see Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 451 U.S. 504, preempts state claims whether raised under state statutes or at common law

Summary of this case from Oglesby v. Delaware Hudson Railway Co.

issuing summary affirmance of decision holding that Section 5 applied to judges

Summary of this case from Thompson v. Attorney Gen. of State
Case details for

Roberts v. Burlington Industries

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTS, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. BURLINGTON…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 23, 1986

Citations

477 U.S. 901 (1986)

Citing Cases

Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne

(d) Appellant's contention that failure to pre-empt the Maine statute will allow employers to circumvent…

Local Union 598 Etc. v. J.A. Jones Const. Co.

The Second Circuit approved of these district court rulings in a decision holding that state wage collection…