From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. S K Everhart Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jul 31, 2003
1:00CV00260 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 31, 2003)

Opinion

1:OOCV00260

July 31, 2003


ORDER


For the reasons stated in a contemporaneously filed Memorandum Opinion, the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [Docs. # 35, 39] are DENIED, R.J. Reynold's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Partial Summary Judgment as to S K Everhart, Stephen Everhart, Great Steaks Market, and John Sechrest [Doc. # 59] is DENIED, and R.J. Reynold's Motion to Strike [Doc. # 73] is MOOT.

The docket should be amended to reflect that S K Everhart's Pleading Doc. # 70 is a responsive pleading rather than a Motion to Dismiss.


Summaries of

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. S K Everhart Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jul 31, 2003
1:00CV00260 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 31, 2003)
Case details for

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. S K Everhart Inc.

Case Details

Full title:R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY Plaintiff, v. S K EVERHART INC. d/b/a…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jul 31, 2003

Citations

1:00CV00260 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 31, 2003)

Citing Cases

AARP v. Am. Family Prepaid Legal Corp., Inc.

Thus, section 1962(c) requires proof of (1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of…