From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 12, 2007
CV F 06-00193 OWW DLB HC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2007)

Opinion


MARK LEE REYNOLDS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. No. CV F 06-00193 OWW DLB HC United States District Court, E.D. California. January 12, 2007

          ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Doc. 4]

          DENNIS L. BECK, District Judge.

         Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

         On March 27, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. (Court Doc. 4.)

         There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See e.g., Anderson v. Heinze , 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 889 (1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick , 727 F.2d 773 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 (1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 12, 2007
CV F 06-00193 OWW DLB HC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Reynolds v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARK LEE REYNOLDS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 12, 2007

Citations

CV F 06-00193 OWW DLB HC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2007)