From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. Kinney

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
May 5, 1911
16 Cal.App. 156 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)

Opinion

Civ. No. 943.

May 5, 1911.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Gurney E. Newlin, and Roy V. Reppy, for Appellant.

Anderson Anderson, for Respondent.


Action to recover for services alleged to have been rendered at the special instance and request of defendant. Judgment went for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from an order of court denying his motion for a new trial. His sole contention is that the finding of the court is not supported by the evidence.

The evidence clearly supports the finding. It tends to prove that plaintiff, while in charge of the Country Clubhouse at Ocean Park and conducting a restaurant in connection therewith, was requested by defendant to furnish to the members of certain designated parties accustomed to gather at said club-house lunches and such refreshments as they might require, the actual cost of which should be charged to defendant, who promised and agreed to pay the same each month; that plaintiff performed the services and furnished the refreshments so requested, charging therefor actual cost; that she rendered defendant a final statement of account in the sum of $525.70, which was the actual cost to her of furnishing said lunches and refreshments, and requested him to pay the amount thereof, which he agreed to pay on the following Saturday, but failed to do so, promising it at a future date. Defendant never disputed the bill, but failed to pay the same. The fact that the testimony of the plaintiff is contradicted by defendant constitutes no ground for reversing the order of the court in denying a new trial.

There is no merit in the appeal, and the order is affirmed.

Allen, P. J., and James, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Reeves v. Kinney

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
May 5, 1911
16 Cal.App. 156 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)
Case details for

Reeves v. Kinney

Case Details

Full title:M. A. REEVES, Respondent, v. ABBOT KINNEY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: May 5, 1911

Citations

16 Cal.App. 156 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)
116 P. 309

Citing Cases

Kilgore v. Williams

J. J. Curtis and Herman Maddox, both of Jasper, for appellee. The bill is sufficient as a bill for discovery.…

Gulf Electric Co. v. Fried

The case of Watson v. Jones Bros., 121 Ala. 579, 580, 25 So. 720, cited by appellee, was a suit in equity…