holding that the term "eligible" can only be logically construed as covering just a sub-group of employees because it would be superfluous if it were read to include all common law employees
Summary of this case from Montesano v. Xerox Corp. Retirement IncomeNo. 98-123.
October 5, 1998.
C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 141 F. 3d 1405.
holding that the term "eligible" can only be logically construed as covering just a sub-group of employees because it would be superfluous if it were read to include all common law employees
Summary of this case from Montesano v. Xerox Corp. Retirement Incometaking "judicial notice of pleadings filed in a related state court action"
Summary of this case from United States Bank National Association v. Veincentotzssummarizing background facts as presented in testimony before grand jury
Summary of this case from In the Matter, Grand Jury Investigationspecifying standard for seeking of blood samples
Summary of this case from In the Matter of a Grand Jury Investigationreferring to circumstances in which blood samples may be obtained without violating constitutional prohibition
Summary of this case from Cummins v. Commonwealthreviewing varying formulations of "probable cause" in different contexts
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Irvin I.noting that Brady requires the State to disclose material exculpatory evidence in the possession of police agencies and other parts of the prosecutorial team
Summary of this case from Reed v. Statenoting that Brady requires the State to disclose material exculpatory evidence in the possession of police agencies and other parts of the prosecutorial team
Summary of this case from Pitman v. StateFull title:RATCLIFF ET AL. v. CAPITAL CITIES/ABC, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 5, 1998
Defendants contend that the fact that the agents signed these agreements designating themselves as…
Commonwealth v. WilliamsProbable cause for a search "does not mean that it must appear more likely than not that the items are in a…