From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pringle v. Blalock

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2006
No. 2:02-cv-1957-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2006)

Opinion

No. 2:02-cv-1957-GEB-CMK.

January 26, 2006


ORDER


The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 6, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 6, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders and rules; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Pringle v. Blalock

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2006
No. 2:02-cv-1957-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Pringle v. Blalock

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE DALE PRINGLE, Plaintiff, v. JIM BLALOCK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

No. 2:02-cv-1957-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2006)