From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Priest v. Bentley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
2:21-cv-00058-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00058-TLN-KJN

02-07-2023

DAVID PRIEST, Plaintiff, v. BENTLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 2, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 70.) Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 77.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 2, 2022, (ECF No. 70), are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 64) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Priest v. Bentley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
2:21-cv-00058-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Priest v. Bentley

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PRIEST, Plaintiff, v. BENTLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-00058-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)