From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PNC Equip. Fin. LLC v. California Fairs Fin. Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-02019-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-02019-GEB-DAD

09-21-2011

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as successor to NATIONAL CITY COMMERCIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA FAIRS FINANCING AUTHORITY, a California joint powers authority; 15TH DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION, a state institution of the State of California; 18TH DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION, a state institution of the State of California; 21ST DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION, a state institution of the State of California; 26TH DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION, a state institution of the State of California; and 27TH DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION, a state institution of the State of California; 30TH DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION, a state institution of the State of California; EL DORADO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION, INC., a California corporation; LODI GRAPE FESTIVAL AND NATIONAL WINE SHOW, INC., a California corporation; and MADERA COUNTY LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION, a California corporation, Defendants.

KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California RICHARD J. MAGASIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General Specially Appearing for the 15th District Agricultural Association, et al.


KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

RICHARD J. MAGASIN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Specially Appearing for the 15th District

Agricultural Association, et al.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF THE DISTRICT

AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION DEFENDANTS FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT


[Local Rule 144]

Complaint Served: August 9, 2011

Current Response Date: September 21, 2011

Requested Response Date: October 21, 2011

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

THE COURT has reviewed the Application of the District Agricultural Association Defendants for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, and the accompanying Declarations of Daniel P. Jacobs and Allan S. Ono. After consideration of the facts and legal arguments presented by the parties, the Court determines that good cause exists to provide the 15th, 18th, 21st, 26th, 27th and 30th District Agricultural Associations with additional time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for: (1) Specific Performance; (2) Declaratory Relief; and (3) Injunctive Relief (Complaint).

ORDER

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants 15th District Agricultural Association, 18th District Agricultural Association, 21st District Agricultural Association, 26th District Agricultural Association, 27th District Agricultural Association, and 30th District Agricultural Association shall each have until October 21, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

GARLAND E. BURELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

PNC Equip. Fin. LLC v. California Fairs Fin. Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-02019-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)
Case details for

PNC Equip. Fin. LLC v. California Fairs Fin. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 21, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-02019-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)