Opinion
Civil No. 04-724-CO.
September 15, 2004
ORDER
Magistrate Judge John P. Cooney filed Findings and Recommendation on August 19, 2004, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Plaintiff has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, givende novo review of Magistrate Judge Cooney's rulings.
I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation filed August 19, 2003, in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (#6) is denied, and defendant's motion to dismiss (#8) is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.