From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petroleos Mexicanos v. SK Engineering & Construction Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Jul 16, 2014
572 F. App'x 60 (2d Cir. 2014)

Summary

holding that a wire fraud scheme was extraterritorial despite having three financial transactions involving the United States

Summary of this case from United States v. Elbaz

Opinion

13-3175-cv

07-16-2014

PETROLEOS MEXICANOS, PEMEX-REFINANCION, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SK ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD., SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, Defendants-Appellees.

Appearing for Appellants: Carlos F. Gonzalez, Diaz Reus & Targ LLP (Michael Diaz, Jr., Marta Colomar Garcia, on the brief), Miami, FL. Appearing for Appellees: David G. Hille, White & Case LLP (Owen C. Pell, on the brief), New York, N.Y., for SK Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. Brant W. Bishop, Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Thomas D. Yannucci, Chris Posteraro, Ragan Naresh, on the brief), Washington, D.C., for Siemens Aktiengesellschaft.


SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York on the 16th day of July, two thousand fourteen. Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER,

PETER W. HALL,

SUSAN L. CARNEY,

Circuit Judges.
Appearing for Appellants:

Carlos F. Gonzalez, Diaz Reus & Targ LLP (Michael Diaz, Jr.,

Marta Colomar Garcia, on the brief), Miami, FL.
Appearing for Appellees:

David G. Hille, White & Case LLP (Owen C. Pell, on the brief),

New York, N.Y., for SK Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.

Brant W. Bishop, Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Thomas D. Yannucci,

Chris Posteraro, Ragan Naresh, on the brief), Washington, D.C.,

for Siemens Aktiengesellschaft.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Stanton, J.).

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Petroleos Mexicanos and its subsidiary Pemex-Refinancion (together, "Pemex") appeal from the July 30, 2013 memorandum and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Stanton, J.) dismissing their complaint alleging defendants SK Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. and Siemens Aktiengesellschaft violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., by bribing Pemex officials to approve overrun and expense payments in the course of an oil refinery rehabilitation project. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for review.

In our recent decision in European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., - F.3d. -, 2014 WL 1613878 (2d Cir. April 23, 2014), our Court held that "the extraterritorial application of RICO [is] coextensive with the extraterritorial application of the relevant predicate statutes." Id. at *7. We also held that wire fraud cannot serve as such an extraterritorial predicate. Here, because Pemex relies exclusively on the wire fraud statute in pleading predicate acts, it has failed to state a claim sufficient to support extraterritorial application of RICO. To the extent Pemex relies on several allegations of domestic activity to support its RICO claim, these, too, are insufficient. "[S]imply alleging that some domestic conduct occurred cannot support a claim of domestic application." Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. Access Indus., Inc., 631 F.3d 29, 32-33 (2d Cir. 2010).

The scheme alleged by Pemex possesses three minimal contacts with the United States: the financing was obtained here, the invoices were sent to the bank for payment, and the bank issued payment. Absent from the pleadings are any allegations that the scheme was directed from (or to) the United States. The activities involved in the alleged scheme-falsifying the invoices, the bribes, the approval of the false invoices-took place outside of the United States. The allegations of domestic conduct are simply insufficient to sustain RICO jurisdiction.

In the supplemental briefing requested by this Court, Pemex sought remand with a direction that the district court permit Pemex to amend its complaint. Pemex asserts that ongoing proceedings might unearth information regarding cost overruns and bribes that may provide a basis for them to plead additional domestic contacts. However, Pemex has not adduced any information that would demonstrably alter the substance of its complaint. See In re Am. Exp. Co. S'holder Litig., 39 F.3d 395, 402 (2d Cir. 1994) (holding that "leave to amend may be denied if the amendment would be futile"); see also Pac. Inv. Mgmt. Co. LLC v. Mayer Brown LLP, 603 F.3d 144, 160 (2d Cir. 2010) ("Plaintiffs do not disclose to us those recently discovered facts and there is therefore no basis for suggesting, much less concluding, that plaintiffs could amend their claims . . . in a way that would make them viable."). Without a more definitive statement of information that could alter our analysis, we decline to remand with direction to permit amendment.

We have considered the remainder of Pemex's arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court hereby is AFFIRMED. Each side to bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk


Summaries of

Petroleos Mexicanos v. SK Engineering & Construction Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Jul 16, 2014
572 F. App'x 60 (2d Cir. 2014)

holding that a wire fraud scheme was extraterritorial despite having three financial transactions involving the United States

Summary of this case from United States v. Elbaz

holding that "wire fraud cannot serve as such an extraterritorial predicate" and that "because [plaintiff] relies exclusively on the wire fraud statute in pleading predicate acts, it has failed to state a claim sufficient to support extraterritorial application of RICO."

Summary of this case from FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, L.P. v. CitiBank, N.A.

holding that wire fraud can occur extraterritorially, even if money is wired from a U.S. bank in furtherance of a fraudulent scheme

Summary of this case from Elsevier, Inc. v. Grossman

holding that wire fraud occurred outside the United States, even though defendants caused money to be wired from a U.S. bank account

Summary of this case from Elsevier, Inc. v. Grossman

finding no domestic violation of the wire fraud statute despite the fact that U.S. wires were used to further a fraud

Summary of this case from Elsevier, Inc. v. Grossman

dismissing RICO claim where the complaint failed to make "any allegations that the scheme was directed from (or to) the United States"

Summary of this case from Jorge Yarur Bascuñan, Tarascona Corp. v. Daniel Yarur Elsaca, CristiáN Jara Taito, Oscar BretóN Dieguez, GM & E Asset Mgmt. S.A., Fintair Fin. Corp.

In Petroleos Mexicano, the Circuit found that the "three minimal contacts with the United States" alleged as part of the wire fraud scheme were insufficient due to the "absen[ce] [of]... any allegations that the scheme was directed from (or to) the United States."

Summary of this case from United States v. Hawit

In Petroleos, the Second Circuit held that a wire fraud scheme in which a foreign corporation defrauded foreign defendants was extraterritorial because the pleadings did not allege "that the scheme was directed from (or to) the United States," and because the "activities involved in the alleged scheme—falsifying the invoices, the bribes, the approval of the false invoices—took place outside of the United States."

Summary of this case from Directories v. Yahoo! Inc.

In Petroleos Mexicanos, the wire fraud scheme had three contacts with the United States: the foreign defendants obtained financing in the United States, transmitted seven false invoices for over $159 million via facsimile through New York, and made payments through a trust in New York.

Summary of this case from United States v. Prevezon Holdings Ltd.
Case details for

Petroleos Mexicanos v. SK Engineering & Construction Co.

Case Details

Full title:PETROLEOS MEXICANOS, PEMEX-REFINANCION, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 16, 2014

Citations

572 F. App'x 60 (2d Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Ltd. v. Barclays Bank PLC

In this Circuit, "the wire fraud statute does not have extraterritorial application and may not serve as a…

Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Credit Suisse Grp. AG

By contrast, the Second Circuit's summary order in Petroleos Mexicanos v. SK Engineering & Const. Co. Ltd.…