holding that plaintiff's complaint stated a valid claim against defendant for "wrongfully discharging her from her employment in retaliation for her refusal to testify falsely or incompletely"
Summary of this case from Shoaf v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.1985
holding that plaintiff's complaint stated a valid claim against defendant for "wrongfully discharging her from her employment in retaliation for her refusal to testify falsely or incompletely"
Summary of this case from Shoaf v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.holding that non-outsider status is immaterial where the allegations in the complaint show defendants' motives for procuring the plaintiff's termination were unrelated to their business interest
Summary of this case from Barker v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1985
Id. at 305, 382 S.E.2d at 839 (citations omitted). After analyzing the leading North Carolina cases of Coman…
Salt v. Applied Analytical, Inc.Plaintiff next alleges she contributed additional consideration which would remove the contract from the…