Summary
holding that public defender does not have conflict of interest with two prosecution witnesses represented in wholly different matters by other attorneys in public defender's office
Summary of this case from Com. v. ThomasOpinion
1992
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1992
529 Pa. 617 (Pa. 1992)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1992
529 Pa. 617 (Pa. 1992)
holding that public defender does not have conflict of interest with two prosecution witnesses represented in wholly different matters by other attorneys in public defender's office
Summary of this case from Com. v. ThomasCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Citations
529 Pa. 617 (Pa. 1992)
Citing Cases
Meridian Oil and Gas v. Penn Cent
"A motion in limine is a procedure for obtaining a ruling on the admissibility of evidence prior to or during…
Commonwealth v. MontalvoIn some instances, a remand to the trial court might be necessary in order to rule on the merits of an…