From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perotti v. Marlberry

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 7, 2010
No. 05-60172 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 7, 2010)

Opinion

No. 05-60172.

June 7, 2010


ORDER


On April 22, 2010, Plaintiff moved to amend his complaint. However, he did not attach a copy of his proposed amended complaint to his motion. The Defendants have filed a motion to compel him to do so [Docket #112].

E.D. Mich. Local Rule 15.1 directs that "[a] party who moves to amend a pleading shall attach the proposed amended pleading to the motion." Therefore, Defendants' motion to compel the filing of a proposed amended complaint [Docket #112] is GRANTED.

Plaintiff's originally filed motion to amend complaint [Docket #110] is hereby STRICKEN.

Within 21 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall re-file his motion to amend complaint, and shall attach to it a copy of his proposed amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perotti v. Marlberry

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 7, 2010
No. 05-60172 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Perotti v. Marlberry

Case Details

Full title:JOHN W. PEROTTI, Plaintiff, v. MS. MARLBERRY, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 7, 2010

Citations

No. 05-60172 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 7, 2010)