From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelham v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 7, 2014
No. 03:13-cv-01233-HU (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2014)

Opinion

No. 03:13-cv-01233-HU

08-07-2014

LISA PELHAM, ASHLY PELHAM, MIRANDA PELHAM Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation [19] on June 23, 2014, in which he recommends that this Court grant the government's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [11].

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings & Recommendation [19]. Accordingly, the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [11] granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 7 day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pelham v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 7, 2014
No. 03:13-cv-01233-HU (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2014)
Case details for

Pelham v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LISA PELHAM, ASHLY PELHAM, MIRANDA PELHAM Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 7, 2014

Citations

No. 03:13-cv-01233-HU (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2014)