Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-2550
08-18-2017
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION, AND REMANDING
This court has reviewed the United States Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation on the defendant's motion for summary judgment signed on August 3, 2017, and made a de novo determination. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order. This court finds and concludes that the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying social security benefits was not supported by substantial evidence in the record, because the ALJ improperly found that the plaintiff's driving skills are a transferable skill; failed to consider what vocational adjustment, if any, was necessary to work as a "delivery car rental driver," and failed to obtain medical evidence as to whether the plaintiff's diabetes can be controlled without insulin. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, Docket Entry No. 14, is granted; the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, Docket Entry No. 16, is denied. This matter is remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with instructions to the Administrative Law Judge to further develop the record consistent with this order.
An order of dismissal is separately entered.
SIGNED on August 18, 2017, at Houston, Texas.
/s/_________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge