concluding that a conviction was improper where the jury charge contained a non-indicted theory of murder
Summary of this case from Bundy v. StateNo. 83-895.
January 23, 1984.
C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 713 F.2d 1052.
concluding that a conviction was improper where the jury charge contained a non-indicted theory of murder
Summary of this case from Bundy v. Statecharacterizing Indiana law as unresolved
Summary of this case from Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.In Columbia Briargate Co., the court held that because South Carolina law imposed personal liability on a corporate agent for misrepresentation and because the agent's alleged misrepresentation occurred while he was in South Carolina for a few days, jurisdiction was proper under South Carolina's long arm statute and the fiduciary shield doctrine was inapplicable.
Summary of this case from Escoto v. U.S. LendingFull title:PEARSON v. COLUMBIA BRIARGATE CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 23, 1984
Guard units in the concentration camps were referred to as Waffen-SS Death's Head Battalions or SS…
Webb v. Gaf Corp.The controversy can be reduced to the question of whether the rationale of Yard-Man, championed by the IAM…