holding that a restitution order payable to a state attorney general but for the benefit of the criminal defendant's victims was dischargeable under § 523
Summary of this case from In re DickersonNo. 98-1645.
June 14, 1999, OCTOBER TERM, 1998.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 161 F. 3d 1030.
holding that a restitution order payable to a state attorney general but for the benefit of the criminal defendant's victims was dischargeable under § 523
Summary of this case from In re Dickersonfinding that civil restitution under Illinois's consumer fraud act is not payable for the benefit of the state's attorney general, and thus is dischargeable
Summary of this case from State v. Stancati (In re Stancati)Full title:PAYNE, MOTHER FOR THE MINOR CHILD, HICKS, ET AL. v. CHURCHICH ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 14, 1999
It would be illogical to grant the bankruptcy court such power over the estate representative, yet, based…
Firefighters' Retirement System v. Consulting Group Services, LLC1997); In re TXNB Internal Case, 483 F.3d 292, 300 (5th Cir.2007); In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 929…