From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panaccione v. United States

U.S.
Oct 13, 1969
396 U.S. 837 (1969)

Summary

holding trial court did not err when it refused to order pretrial production of FBI agent's notes of conversation between agent and defendant, where notes were given to defendant at trial

Summary of this case from United States v. Layton

Opinion

No. 333.

October 13, 1969.

Daniel E. Isles for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 412 F. 2d 407.


Summaries of

Panaccione v. United States

U.S.
Oct 13, 1969
396 U.S. 837 (1969)

holding trial court did not err when it refused to order pretrial production of FBI agent's notes of conversation between agent and defendant, where notes were given to defendant at trial

Summary of this case from United States v. Layton

upholding finding that consent to search car, given in police station after arrest, was voluntary

Summary of this case from United States v. Smith

showing evidence in trunk of car and revealing other hiding places during interrogation at station house

Summary of this case from United States v. Hart
Case details for

Panaccione v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PANACCIONE v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 13, 1969

Citations

396 U.S. 837 (1969)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Henderson

Hearst's conviction was affirmed despite her contention that the surreptitious tape recording in her cell of…

U.S. v. Wills

An Allen charge is traditionally understood as "an instruction to consider the point of view of others" when…