vacating district court order dismissing an action filed by a pro se litigant for failure to consider transfer under § 1406
Summary of this case from Chegini v. Harborview Mortg. Loan Tr. 2006-1293-1575.
January 10, 1995.
Appeal from E.D.Va.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
vacating district court order dismissing an action filed by a pro se litigant for failure to consider transfer under § 1406
Summary of this case from Chegini v. Harborview Mortg. Loan Tr. 2006-12In Nationsbank of North Carolina v. Shumate, 45 F.3d 427 (TABLE, text at 1994 WL 717544 (4th Cir. (Va.), 1994), the court of appeals held that ERISA's anti-alienation protection does not continue after actual distribution of the pension, even during the 60-day rollover period, when the pension funds are deposited into a bank account.
Summary of this case from In re HouckFull title:Painewebber, Inc. v. Allen
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Jan 10, 1995
See, e.g., Freel, 14 F.3d at 1312 n. 2.See PaineWebber Inc. v. Allen, 888 F. Supp. 53 (E.D.Va. 1993), aff'd,…
U.S. v. WilsonSuch funds are exempt even if they are commingled with other funds. See NCNB Financial Services, Inc., v.…