narrowing meaning of "lewd, obscene or indecent sexual proposals" to include only "sodomy, indecent exposure or, in the case of sexual proposals addressed to children, to perform some sexual act"
Summary of this case from Summers v. AnchorageNo. 75-232.
October 14, 1975.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 516 F. 2d 1.
narrowing meaning of "lewd, obscene or indecent sexual proposals" to include only "sodomy, indecent exposure or, in the case of sexual proposals addressed to children, to perform some sexual act"
Summary of this case from Summers v. Anchorageapplying Minn. St. 303.13
Summary of this case from Northern States Pump Supply Co. v. BaumannFull title:PACIFIC FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. DEVOTO ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 14, 1975
A similar conclusion as to the effect on first amendment rights of language in statutes regulating sexual…
Lutz v. United StatesThe court, however, later upheld the "sexual proposal" clause against a similar vagueness attack by limiting…