From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North County Comm. Corp. v. Allegiance Telecom Intl

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Nov 1, 2010
Civil No. 10-180-PK (D. Or. Nov. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-180-PK.

November 1, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Papak has issued a Findings and Recommendation [31] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommended that defendants Comcast Phone of Oregon, Electric Lightwave, Eschelon Telecom, Eschelon Telecom of Oregon, and Integra Telecom of Oregon's Motion to Dismiss [17] be denied as moot, and that this action be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation, and this case is remanded to state court.

CONCLUSION

The Findings and Recommendation [31] is adopted and this case is remanded back to the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, County of Multnomah. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [17] is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 1 day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

North County Comm. Corp. v. Allegiance Telecom Intl

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Nov 1, 2010
Civil No. 10-180-PK (D. Or. Nov. 1, 2010)
Case details for

North County Comm. Corp. v. Allegiance Telecom Intl

Case Details

Full title:NORTH COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALLEGIANCE TELECOM…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Nov 1, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-180-PK (D. Or. Nov. 1, 2010)