From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Ziga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-2156 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-2156 MCE JFM (PC)

07-06-2012

DYKE EDWARD NELSON, Plaintiff, v. DR. ALEX ZIGA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 3, 2012, plaintiff filed a document styled as objections to the magistrate judge's order filed April 19, 2012, denying plaintiff's April 9, 2012 motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery in this action. The Court construes this as a request for reconsideration of that order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 19, 2012 (ECF No. 43), is AFFIRMED.

_________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nelson v. Ziga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-2156 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Nelson v. Ziga

Case Details

Full title:DYKE EDWARD NELSON, Plaintiff, v. DR. ALEX ZIGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-2156 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)