From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. California Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00795-AWI-MJS PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00795-AWI-MJS PC

01-13-2012

KEITH NEAL, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT


(ECF No. 14)

Plaintiff Keith Neal ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 6, 2011.

On June 13, 2011, Plaintiff submitted a declaration to the Court in support of his complaint. (ECF No. 14.) It appears that Plaintiff wishes to supplement his complaint with this declaration.

Amended pleadings must be complete within themselves without reference to another pleading, and therefore, partial amendments are not permissible. Local Rule 220. For these reasons, Plaintiff's motion is HEREBY ORDERED DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Neal v. California Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00795-AWI-MJS PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Neal v. California Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:KEITH NEAL, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 13, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00795-AWI-MJS PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)