Summary
holding where non-assignment clause is contained in insurance policy, consent to assign insurance policy is not required when assignment occurred after loss
Summary of this case from Insurance Adj. Bureau v. Allstate Ins. Co.Opinion
October 8, 1946.
November 8, 1946.
Before MAXEY, C. J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON, STEARNE and JONES, JJ.
Appeal, No. 11, March T., 1947, from judgment of Superior Court, April T., 1946, No. 94, affirming judgment of C. P., Allegheny Co., July T., 1945, No. 892, in case of National Memorial Services, Inc., v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Judgment affirmed.
Same case in Superior Court: 159 Pa. Super. 292.
Assumpsit.
Judgment entered for plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, before EGAN, RICHARDSON and ELLENBOGEN, JJ., opinion per curiam. Defendant appealed to Superior Court which affirmed the judgment of the court below. Appeal by defendant to Supreme Court allowed.
D.C. Jennings, for appellant.
Edward I. Roth, with him David M. Janavitz, for appellee.
Argued October 8, 1946.
The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Baldrige.