Summary
holding that plaintiffs' "pre-amendment claims." (i.e., claims for services rendered prior to the effective date of the OBRA amendments), challenging their insurance carrier's application of the "inherent reasonableness" criterion used to determine the proper charge for plaintiffs' services, were in fact challenges to a carrier's amount determinations and were therefore not amenable to judicial review
Summary of this case from Farkas v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganOpinion
No. 88-1068.
March 20, 1989, OCTOBER TERM, 1988.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 857 F. 2d 96.