From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 24, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1352-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1352-LKK-CMK-P.

November 24, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On October 7, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 7, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's second amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend, but without prejudice, for failure to state a claim; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 24, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1352-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL SHAKA SENEGAL MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 24, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1352-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2008)