Mosley v. Puckett

Full title: JOSEPH MOSLEY, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW PUCKETT, et al, Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 30, 2022

1:20-cv-43 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 30, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-43

03-30-2022

JOSEPH MOSLEY, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW PUCKETT, et al, Defendants.

Matthew W. McFarland Judge

Stephanie K. Bowman Magistrate Judge

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 66) AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 28)

Matthew W. McFarland Judge

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. 66), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28), DENIES AS MOOT all pending motions (Doc. 64); and ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.