Summary
In Jenkins v. Morrow, 131 Mo.App. 288, 109 S.W. 1051, loc.cit. 1053, Broaddus, P. J., speaking for this court, said: "In fact, they presented no demand.
Summary of this case from Joyce v. Central Surety Insurance Corp.Opinion
Case No. 2-04-cv-01269-CRW-VCF
09-05-2012
ROBERT MORROW, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL JENKINS, DANIEL ELLIS, WALTER CASTILLO MARTINEZ, RAMON C. SANTANA, all individual, FRETUS FIDUCIA, LLC., ZAG, LLC, ARQUEST INC., DOES 1-30, and ROES 1-30, Defendants.
ORDER
The court has now filed its final order denying Michael Jenkins' 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence requiring imprisonment and payment of restitution in U.S. v. Jenkins, 02-07-cr-00080.
The court directs counsel in this related civil lawsuit now to complete work on final pretrial presentations, and then to be ready for trial.
First the court asks United States Magistrate Judge V. Cameron Ferenbach to schedule and hold a final settlement conference at an early date. If no settlement is achieved, the court will rule on pending summary judgment issues by mid-November and then will schedule a jury trial, if needed, to begin on an early date in December 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________
CHARLES R. WOLLE, JUDGE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT