Opinion
Civil Action 20-756
03-21-2022
CHRISTOPHER B. MONTGOMERY v. ANNETTE LOGSDON, ET AL.
SECTION “R” (1)
ORDER
SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Before the Court is defendants CorrectHealth Plaquemines, LLC (“CorrectHealth”) and Annette Logsdon's motion to dismiss plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and Rehabilitation Act “(RA”) claims. Pursuant to Eastern District of Louisiana Local Civil Rule 73.2(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. On January 18, 2022, Magistrate Judge van Meerveld issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff's ADA and RA claims against defendants CorrectHealth and Logsdon.
R. Doc. 113.
R. Doc. 125 at 7. The remaining defendants did not join CorrectHealth and Logsdon's motion to dismiss, and therefore the R&R does not address claims against those defendants. Id. at 1 n.1.
Plaintiff did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 1 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”).
Having reviewed the R&R, along with plaintiffs complaint, the defendants' motion to dismiss, plaintiffs opposition, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge did not clearly err when it determined that plaintiffs ADA and RA claims against defendants CorrectHealth and Logsdon should be dismissed. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's R&R as its opinion.
Accordingly, the Court orders that defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and that plaintiffs ADA and RA claims against CorrectHealth and Logsdon are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2