From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montemayor v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Feb 27, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-0789 (RBW) (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-0789 (RBW)

02-27-2013

MARCO MONTEMAYOR, Plaintiff, v. ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

This matter is before the Court on the defendants' motion to dismiss under several subsections of Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or for summary judgment under Rule 56. By Order of December 3, 2012, the plaintiff, proceeding pro se, was advised about responding to the defendants' motion and the consequences if he did not respond by January 9, 2013. Specifically, the plaintiff was warned that his failure to respond by the deadline might result in summary dismissal of the case on what would be treated as a conceded motion. The plaintiff has neither responded to the defendants' motion nor sought additional time to do so. Hence, the Court will grant the defendants' motion to dismiss as conceded and will dismiss the case.

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum.

_________

Reggie B. Walton

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Montemayor v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Feb 27, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-0789 (RBW) (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Montemayor v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:MARCO MONTEMAYOR, Plaintiff, v. ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-0789 (RBW) (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 2013)